Saturday, February 3, 2007

Response to readings

All three articles assigned did not offer any profoundly earth shattering information relative to technology and how its used by and for children. I would assume that most of us who have raised children through this technological frenzy saw bits and pieces of ourselves as well as our children in the articles. Zero to Six quantified, by use of lots of data, what I already knew and lived through. One thing I didn't get was the testing of kids under the age of one. The article I enjoyed the most is "What Next? Toddler Netizen, Playstation Thumb, Techno-literacies".

While, again, the information is not new, some issues were examined that validated what I know to be true as an educator and parent. When Bill Clinton became President, one thing he said he would do was to see that every household had a computer. I knew that was hogwash when he said it. He may have meant well, but in the end it did not happen. And as cited in point # 4 of "What Next?...", what continues to be ignored is "that not all families are equally situated to have access to the information superhighway."We can not "ignore" the socio-economic factor in the whole scheme of things

Which brings me to a point, I'd like to raise. As a special education teacher, I have observed that most of my students are very proficient at entertaining themselves with their iPods, Playstations and cellphones, however have trouble using nearly identical technology in order to complete their schoolwork; most children that have computers don't have printers or printing supplies. To me, what's a computer without a printer? Many kids are using technology for entertainment, not academics.

Kids are learning logic through icons as well as through words. Video games teach kids how to multi-task and make choices and the children have to retain what the choices mean and represent and make decisions based on that memory. Technology teaches kids how to do things but the skills acquired or used are not qualified as academic ways of learning. Traditional teaching of literacy needs to be re-examined with consideration to this kind of pre-education.

In a nutshell... WE ALL HAVE TO ADJUST...our thinking, our methodology and ways of doing things. Everyone is really just worried that this 21st Century generation of kids are going to be desensitized and isolated from each other. But that was our parents' worry and their parents' worry as well.

4 comments:

EOTeach said...

I too worry that many children will be lagging behind in this technological age because they don't have access to the same educational technology as their more affluent peers, neither at home or in school. We are just getting to the point where there are at least a couple of computers for students use in each of our classrooms. Now it is up to us as educators to make sure we learn to correctly use these resources to help our students grow and flourish.

Fabulous at Fifty said...

In my school, each teacher be they special ed or mainstream teachers, have access to FIVE computers for their classes. This is absurb! Ideally, there should be a computer for each student...IDEALLY!

Fabulous at Fifty said...

Hey Guy,

I don't know about the group as a whole, but I do believe I can safely speak for the EOSD folk by saying, February 16th can't come fast enough!

I am going to VA to be with my family; it's two nieces' birthdays and another niece is arriving home from Korea, where she has been for almost a year playing her heart out (she plays the clarinet) for our country. As I said in my profile, "I'm happiest when I'm with my family."

Some of you have some really nice blog pages. You have nice pix and colors and ...I want mine to look like that. HELP! HAHAHAHAHA!!!


It's Oscar time, so there's not much of anything to see at the theatre. Saw the Super Bowl last night; wanted the Bears to win, but really didn't care since it was such an historically auspicious occasion!

God Bless you all...Enjoy the rest of your week.

Fabulous at Fifty said...

sorry...meant, historical